PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDB.MI vs. INTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. (BDB.MI) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BDB.MI is traded in EUR, while INTU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INTU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDB.MI achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -53.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BDB.MI has outperformed INTU with an annualized return of 22.11%, while INTU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.


BDB.MI

1D
1.71%
1M
12.17%
YTD
6.31%
6M
8.49%
1Y
33.77%
3Y*
49.95%
5Y*
28.81%
10Y*
22.11%

INTU

1D
-3.17%
1M
-23.68%
YTD
-53.67%
6M
-54.11%
1Y
-60.96%
3Y*
-13.72%
5Y*
-6.68%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDB.MI
Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A.
6.31%47.49%97.32%26.48%5.68%22.24%5.79%53.32%-21.13%20.83%
INTU
Intuit Inc.
-53.67%-6.50%7.83%56.91%-35.35%83.00%34.08%37.14%31.77%22.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BDB.MI and INTU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007

0.06

The correlation between BDB.MI and INTU shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDB.MI vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDB.MI
BDB.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BDB.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

INTU
INTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. (BDB.MI) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDB.MIINTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.70

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

-0.97

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

-1.81

+9.11

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDB.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the INTU Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDB.MI and INTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDB.MIINTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

-1.37

+2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

-0.18

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.34

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.49

-0.88

Drawdowns

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDB.MI drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than INTU's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDB.MI and INTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDB.MIINTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-63.04%

-36.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-63.04%

+50.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-63.04%

+39.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-63.04%

+38.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.03%

-63.04%

+23.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.09%

-63.04%

-36.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.74%

-10.55%

-89.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

33.64%

-29.01%

Volatility

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. (BDB.MI) is 7.98%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 28.98%. This indicates that BDB.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDB.MIINTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

28.98%

-21.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.19%

42.73%

-22.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.23%

44.52%

-15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.86%

37.25%

-9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.29%

34.13%

-4.84%

Dividends

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison

BDB.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than INTU's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDB.MI
Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A.
5.38%4.83%3.88%5.41%4.48%4.25%4.02%3.30%5.79%3.68%4.30%2.72%
INTU
Intuit Inc.
1.54%0.65%0.60%0.52%0.72%0.38%0.57%0.74%0.83%0.89%1.08%1.09%

Financials

BDB.MI vs. INTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. and Intuit Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BDB.MI values in EUR, INTU values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BDB.MI and INTU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDB.MI and INTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer