PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDB.MI vs. G.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. (BDB.MI) and Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (G.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDB.MI achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than G.MI's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BDB.MI has outperformed G.MI with an annualized return of 22.11%, while G.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 18.68% annualized return.


BDB.MI

1D
1.71%
1M
12.17%
YTD
6.31%
6M
8.49%
1Y
33.77%
3Y*
49.95%
5Y*
28.81%
10Y*
22.11%

G.MI

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.72%
YTD
13.11%
6M
19.78%
1Y
26.80%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
25.55%
10Y*
18.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDB.MI
Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A.
6.31%47.49%97.32%26.48%5.68%22.24%5.79%53.32%-21.13%20.83%
G.MI
Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.
13.11%36.71%50.48%22.46%-2.05%42.05%-19.26%33.03%1.40%13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BDB.MI and G.MI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 1995

0.26

Over the past year, BDB.MI and G.MI have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDB.MI vs. G.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDB.MI
BDB.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BDB.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDB.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

G.MI
G.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
G.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
G.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
G.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
G.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. (BDB.MI) and Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (G.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDB.MIG.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.86

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

6.58

+0.72

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDB.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the G.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDB.MI and G.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDB.MIG.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.46

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.30

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.83

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.22

-0.61

Drawdowns

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDB.MI drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than G.MI's maximum drawdown of -75.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDB.MI and G.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDB.MIG.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-75.80%

-24.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-9.37%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-12.15%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-30.77%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.03%

-46.74%

+6.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.09%

-1.02%

-98.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.74%

-30.41%

-69.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.07%

+0.56%

Volatility

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Volatility Comparison

Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. (BDB.MI) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (G.MI) at 5.22%. This indicates that BDB.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than G.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDB.MIG.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

5.22%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.19%

14.03%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.23%

18.38%

+10.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.86%

19.42%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.29%

22.45%

+6.84%

Dividends

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Dividend Comparison

BDB.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than G.MI's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDB.MI
Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A.
5.38%4.83%3.88%5.41%4.48%4.25%4.02%3.30%5.79%3.68%4.30%2.72%
G.MI
Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.
4.24%4.00%4.69%6.07%9.21%7.89%3.51%4.89%5.82%5.26%5.10%3.55%

Financials

BDB.MI vs. G.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco di Desio e della Brianza S.p.A. and Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BDB.MI and G.MI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDB.MI and G.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer