BCUS vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BCUS (Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCUS returned 15.86% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. BCUS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

BCUS vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCUS achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.

BCUS

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 10.75%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCUS vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF	13.27%	6.56%	2.50%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.52%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BCUS and RSBY is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.16

Return for Risk

BCUS vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCUS

BCUS Risk / Return Rank: 38
BCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCUS vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCUS	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.50	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.18	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.15	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	5.04	+1.08

BCUS vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCUS and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCUS vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCUS drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCUS and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCUS	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.14%	-23.32%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.81%	-7.95%	-1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-6.45%	+4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-13.35%	+10.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	3.39%	-0.85%

Volatility

BCUS vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that BCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCUS	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	3.15%	+3.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	8.37%	+5.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.51%	11.41%	+4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	13.37%	+3.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.44%	13.37%	+3.07%

BCUS vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCUS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCUS vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

BCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than RSBY's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.27%	0.49%	0.23%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCUS and RSBY in my portfolio?

BCUS and RSBY have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCUS or RSBY?

BCUS has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCUS dropped -18.14% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, BCUS or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 15.86% for BCUS. On fees, BCUS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCUS or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCUS or RSBY?

BCUS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCUS or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.27% for BCUS.

What is the main difference between BCUS and RSBY?

BCUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BCUS and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.