PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCUCY vs. PRDSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY) and Prada S.p.A (PRDSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCUCY achieves a -12.53% return, which is significantly lower than PRDSF's -10.77% return.


BCUCY

1D
0.75%
1M
7.05%
6M
8.12%
YTD
-12.53%
1Y
-8.70%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.77%

PRDSF

1D
4.58%
1M
2.59%
6M
-1.64%
YTD
-10.77%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
-8.29%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
5.96%
ALL TIME*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$188.95K$169.27K$484.70K
$13.12K$7.76K$10.43K

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BCUCY
Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR
-12.53%7.17%13.09%35.15%2.92%55.41%25.75%1.77%
PRDSF
Prada S.p.A
-10.77%-27.24%49.21%1.11%-5.79%-13.67%97.14%22.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BCUCY and PRDSF is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2019

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCUCY:

$6.81B

PRDSF:

$12.85B

EPS

BCUCY:

€0.37

PRDSF:

€0.64

PE Ratio

BCUCY:

23.44

PRDSF:

6.80

PEG Ratio

BCUCY:

0.88

PRDSF:

0.21

PS Ratio

BCUCY:

2.22

PRDSF:

0.95

PB Ratio

BCUCY:

10.91

PRDSF:

2.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCUCY:

€2.68B

PRDSF:

€11.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCUCY:

€1.01B

PRDSF:

€9.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCUCY:

€565.57M

PRDSF:

€3.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCUCY vs. PRDSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCUCY
BCUCY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BCUCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCUCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCUCY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BCUCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCUCY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDSF
PRDSF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PRDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY) and Prada S.p.A (PRDSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCUCYPRDSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.05

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.11

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

-0.18

-0.26

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCUCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the PRDSF Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCUCY and PRDSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCUCY drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum PRDSF drawdown of -75.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCUCY and PRDSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCUCYPRDSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.36%

-75.14%

+29.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.49%

-30.04%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.50%

-47.86%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.50%

-47.86%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.77%

-45.34%

+19.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-41.58%

+24.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.40%

18.66%

+0.74%

Volatility

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Volatility Comparison

Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY) has a higher volatility of 15.12% compared to Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) at 10.59%. This indicates that BCUCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCUCYPRDSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

10.59%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.98%

29.53%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.26%

55.56%

-6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.48%

55.35%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.16%

53.26%

-1.10%

Dividends

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Dividend Comparison

BCUCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than PRDSF's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BCUCY
Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR
1.21%0.88%0.89%0.71%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRDSF
Prada S.p.A
0.49%3.27%1.81%2.19%1.49%0.73%0.00%1.89%

Financials

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR and Prada S.p.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR and Prada S.p.A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BCUCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported a gross profit of -3.89M and revenue of 718.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.5%.

PRDSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

BCUCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported an operating income of 74.26M and revenue of 718.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

PRDSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Prada S.p.A reported an operating income of 539.26M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

BCUCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported a net income of 61.31M and revenue of 718.46M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

PRDSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a net income of 332.47M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCUCY and PRDSF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCUCY has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to PRDSF (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCUCY dropped -45.36% vs PRDSF's -75.14%.

PRDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCUCY and PRDSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer