BCUCY vs. PRDSF
BCUCY (Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR) and PRDSF (Prada S.p.A) are both stocks. Both operate in the Luxury Goods industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, BCUCY returned 9.45%/yr vs -5.78%/yr for PRDSF. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCUCY achieves a -19.31% return, which is significantly lower than PRDSF's -15.61% return.
BCUCY
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -19.31%
- 6M
- -24.36%
- 1Y
- -18.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- —
PRDSF
- 1D
- -9.12%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- -15.61%
- 6M
- -15.61%
- 1Y
- -21.25%
- 3Y*
- -7.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCUCY Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR | -19.31% | 7.17% | 13.09% | 35.15% | 2.92% | 55.41% | 25.75% | 1.77% |
PRDSF Prada S.p.A | -15.61% | -27.24% | 49.21% | 1.11% | -5.79% | -13.67% | 97.14% | 22.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCUCY and PRDSF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2019 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
BCUCY:
$6.33B
PRDSF:
$12.15B
BCUCY:
€0.37
PRDSF:
€0.66
BCUCY:
21.81
PRDSF:
6.30
BCUCY:
0.82
PRDSF:
0.19
BCUCY:
2.07
PRDSF:
0.95
BCUCY:
10.16
PRDSF:
2.29
BCUCY:
€2.68B
PRDSF:
€11.13B
BCUCY:
€1.01B
PRDSF:
€8.92B
BCUCY:
€565.57M
PRDSF:
€3.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCUCY vs. PRDSF — Risk / Return Rank
BCUCY
PRDSF
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY) and Prada S.p.A (PRDSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCUCY | PRDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.98 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.68 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -1.10 | +0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCUCY drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum PRDSF drawdown of -75.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCUCY and PRDSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCUCY | PRDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -75.14% | +29.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.50% | -31.42% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.50% | -47.86% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.50% | -47.86% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.52% | -48.31% | +16.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -41.54% | +24.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.40% | 19.39% | +2.01% |
Volatility
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY) is 13.13%, while Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that BCUCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRDSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCUCY | PRDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 14.80% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.34% | 28.74% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.79% | 58.60% | -10.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.23% | 55.43% | -7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.23% | 53.17% | -0.94% |
Dividends
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Dividend Comparison
BCUCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than PRDSF's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCUCY Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR | 1.31% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRDSF Prada S.p.A | 0.52% | 3.27% | 1.81% | 2.19% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 1.89% |
Financials
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR and Prada S.p.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCUCY vs. PRDSF - Profitability Comparison
BCUCY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported a gross profit of -3.89M and revenue of 718.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.5%.
PRDSF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 2.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.
BCUCY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported an operating income of 74.26M and revenue of 718.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
PRDSF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prada S.p.A reported an operating income of 712.40M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
BCUCY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported a net income of 61.31M and revenue of 718.46M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
PRDSF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a net income of 463.48M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCUCY and PRDSF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRDSF has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to BCUCY (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCUCY dropped -45.36% vs PRDSF's -75.14%.
PRDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCUCY and PRDSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer