PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSVX vs. FSTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -10.01% return, which is significantly lower than FSTSX's 7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSVX has underperformed FSTSX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while FSTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.


BCSVX

1D
1.57%
1M
2.60%
YTD
-10.01%
6M
-10.72%
1Y
-18.84%
3Y*
1.18%
5Y*
-3.36%
10Y*
7.38%

FSTSX

1D
-1.54%
1M
1.97%
YTD
7.21%
6M
10.28%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
-10.01%-2.30%8.17%20.04%-31.56%12.69%44.75%26.41%-3.39%36.56%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
7.21%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSVX and FSTSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.76

The correlation between BCSVX and FSTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSVX vs. FSTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSVX
BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSVXFSTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.08

1.31

-2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.47

1.92

-3.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.24

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

1.62

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

5.50

-6.55

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the FSTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSVX and FSTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSVXFSTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

1.31

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.38

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.62

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.62

-0.17

Drawdowns

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than FSTSX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and FSTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSVXFSTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.93%

-38.91%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.35%

-11.22%

-21.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.35%

-14.47%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.93%

-38.91%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.93%

-38.91%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.03%

-1.54%

-23.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-7.90%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.75%

3.30%

+13.45%

Volatility

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSVXFSTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.42%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

11.10%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

13.95%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

16.42%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

15.94%

+1.19%

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSVX vs. FSTSX - Dividend Comparison

BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than FSTSX's 14.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.07%0.74%0.30%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.21%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSVX and FSTSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCSVX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FSTSX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs FSTSX's -38.91%.

FSTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSVX and FSTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer