BCSSX vs. UMBHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BCSSX (Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. BCSSX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.

Performance

BCSSX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCSSX

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: 11.34%
• YTD: -2.83%
• 6M: -6.34%
• 1Y: -2.73%
• 3Y*: -0.49%
• 5Y*: -5.83%
• 10Y*: 5.69%

UMBHX

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSSX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCSSX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares	5.11%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSSX and UMBHX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-1.00

Return for Risk

BCSSX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSSX

BCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSSX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCSSX	UMBHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCSSX	UMBHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	1.79	-1.46

Drawdowns

BCSSX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSSX drawdown since its inception was -55.58%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSSX and UMBHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSSX	UMBHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.58%	-1.86%	-53.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.36%	0.00%	-44.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-0.84%	-14.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCSSX	UMBHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.41%	30.30%	-7.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.37%	30.30%	+7.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.33%	30.30%	+1.03%

BCSSX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSSX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCSSX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

BCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 98.06%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCSSX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares	98.06%	95.29%	49.47%	8.99%	11.63%	9.04%	7.27%	8.43%	6.72%	5.85%	5.48%	9.07%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCSSX and UMBHX in my portfolio?

BCSSX and UMBHX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.