PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSSX vs. BCSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSSX achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly higher than BCSVX's -10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSSX has underperformed BCSVX with an annualized return of 5.69%, while BCSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.38% annualized return.


BCSSX

1D
3.53%
1M
11.34%
YTD
-2.83%
6M
-6.34%
1Y
-2.73%
3Y*
-0.49%
5Y*
-5.83%
10Y*
5.69%

BCSVX

1D
1.57%
1M
2.60%
YTD
-10.01%
6M
-10.72%
1Y
-18.84%
3Y*
1.18%
5Y*
-3.36%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCSSX
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares
-2.83%-12.18%10.05%19.40%-37.77%-4.06%45.51%29.49%-0.37%29.16%
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
-10.01%-2.30%8.17%20.04%-31.56%12.69%44.75%26.41%-3.39%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSSX and BCSVX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.55

The correlation between BCSSX and BCSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSSX vs. BCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSSX
BCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BCSVX
BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSSXBCSVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

-1.08

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.06

-1.47

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.83

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

-0.55

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.15

-1.06

+0.91

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is higher than the BCSVX Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSSX and BCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSSXBCSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

-1.08

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

-0.18

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.43

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.45

-0.12

Drawdowns

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSSX drawdown since its inception was -55.58%, which is greater than BCSVX's maximum drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSSX and BCSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSSXBCSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.58%

-43.93%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.75%

-32.35%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.58%

-32.35%

-23.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.58%

-43.93%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.58%

-43.93%

-11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.36%

-25.03%

-19.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-12.11%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

16.75%

-5.47%

Volatility

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) at 4.48%. This indicates that BCSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSSXBCSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

4.48%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.64%

13.78%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

16.86%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.37%

18.65%

+18.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.33%

17.13%

+14.20%

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSSX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSVX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSSX vs. BCSVX - Dividend Comparison

BCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 98.06%, more than BCSVX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSSX
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares
98.06%95.29%49.47%8.99%11.63%9.04%7.27%8.43%6.72%5.85%5.48%9.07%
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.07%0.74%0.30%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSSX and BCSVX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCSSX has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to BCSVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSSX dropped -55.58% vs BCSVX's -43.93%.

BCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSSX and BCSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer