PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSSX vs. SGPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) and ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSSX achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than SGPIX's 21.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSSX has underperformed SGPIX with an annualized return of 6.28%, while SGPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.


BCSSX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.59%
6M
13.80%
YTD
5.90%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
-0.25%
5Y*
-5.99%
10Y*
6.28%
ALL TIME*
9.57%

SGPIX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.92%
6M
14.79%
YTD
21.50%
1Y
30.03%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
8.60%
ALL TIME*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCSSX
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares
5.90%-12.18%10.05%19.40%-37.77%-4.06%45.51%29.49%-0.37%29.16%
SGPIX
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund
21.50%3.52%7.53%15.35%-22.72%13.29%17.43%18.95%-5.76%12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSSX and SGPIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2011

0.81

The correlation between BCSSX and SGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSSX vs. SGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCSSX
BCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SGPIX
SGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) and ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCSSXSGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.28

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

3.07

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

10.29

-9.97

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SGPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSSX and SGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSSX drawdown since its inception was -55.58%, smaller than the maximum SGPIX drawdown of -58.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSSX and SGPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSSXSGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.58%

-58.70%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.65%

-9.15%

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.58%

-27.72%

-27.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.58%

-34.64%

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.58%

-43.14%

-12.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.37%

-3.43%

-35.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.13%

-11.20%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.55%

2.73%

+8.82%

Volatility

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares (BCSSX) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) at 4.03%. This indicates that BCSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSSXSGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

4.03%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

12.96%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

17.84%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.47%

21.60%

+15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.36%

22.31%

+9.05%

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSSX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SGPIX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSSX vs. SGPIX - Dividend Comparison

BCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.98%, while SGPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSSX
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund Institutional Shares
89.98%95.29%49.47%8.99%11.63%9.04%7.27%8.43%6.72%5.85%5.48%9.07%
SGPIX
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.18%1.58%0.80%3.80%2.06%0.00%0.00%4.29%0.00%0.00%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSSX and SGPIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCSSX has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to SGPIX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSSX dropped -55.58% vs SGPIX's -58.70%.

SGPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSSX and SGPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer