BCSIX vs. WMKSX
BCSIX (Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund) and WMKSX (WesMark Small Company Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BCSIX returned 5.22%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for WMKSX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCSIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for WMKSX.
Performance
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCSIX achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSIX has underperformed WMKSX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while WMKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.
BCSIX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- -5.70%
- 6M
- -8.97%
- 1Y
- -6.44%
- 3Y*
- -2.50%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
WMKSX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSIX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund | -5.70% | -12.48% | 9.86% | 19.16% | -37.85% | -4.26% | 45.23% | 29.22% | -0.57% | 28.90% |
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund | 20.68% | 16.19% | 22.12% | 19.42% | -20.72% | 22.81% | 36.78% | 20.32% | -13.92% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSIX and WMKSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993 | 0.75 |
The correlation between BCSIX and WMKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSIX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank
BCSIX
WMKSX
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCSIX | WMKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.34 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 4.33 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 14.51 | -15.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSIX drawdown since its inception was -57.17%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSIX and WMKSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSIX | WMKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.17% | -64.09% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -8.50% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.17% | -24.20% | -32.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.17% | -39.84% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.17% | -39.84% | -17.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.92% | 0.00% | -47.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -15.66% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 2.53% | +9.20% |
Volatility
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.89%. This indicates that BCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSIX | WMKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 4.89% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 12.38% | +5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.52% | 17.90% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.12% | 26.13% | +12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 23.98% | +8.40% |
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCSIX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison
BCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.09%, more than WMKSX's 18.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSIX Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund | 115.09% | 108.53% | 52.70% | 9.36% | 12.04% | 9.32% | 7.46% | 8.62% | 6.85% | 5.94% | 5.54% | 9.15% |
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund | 18.98% | 22.91% | 4.69% | 5.93% | 6.23% | 25.75% | 8.21% | 0.00% | 12.53% | 8.59% | 5.26% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSIX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCSIX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to WMKSX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSIX dropped -57.17% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.
WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCSIX and WMKSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer