PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCPIX vs. MRBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCPIX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than MRBIX's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPIX has underperformed MRBIX with an annualized return of 1.54%, while MRBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.68% annualized return.


BCPIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.08%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
1.72%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
1.54%
ALL TIME*
1.27%

MRBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.15%
6M
-0.66%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
1.68%
ALL TIME*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
-0.53%6.71%1.98%6.70%-10.78%-0.34%5.77%6.65%-0.45%2.74%
MRBIX
MFS Total Return Bond Fund
-0.41%7.35%1.77%6.45%-14.52%-0.84%8.83%9.96%-1.03%4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BCPIX and MRBIX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.87

The correlation between BCPIX and MRBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCPIX vs. MRBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCPIX
BCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MRBIX
MRBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MRBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MRBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCPIXMRBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

2.89

+0.07

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the MRBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCPIX and MRBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPIX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, which is greater than MRBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPIX and MRBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCPIXMRBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-19.25%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-2.77%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.70%

-5.42%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

-19.25%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.19%

-19.25%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-2.20%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-2.46%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.12%

-0.17%

Volatility

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Volatility Comparison

Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) at 0.89%. This indicates that BCPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCPIXMRBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.89%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

2.88%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

3.68%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.11%

5.74%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

4.92%

-0.74%

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCPIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MRBIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCPIX vs. MRBIX - Dividend Comparison

BCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than MRBIX's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
3.94%4.32%3.67%2.91%2.54%1.89%1.76%2.77%2.90%2.49%2.84%2.72%
MRBIX
MFS Total Return Bond Fund
3.85%4.21%3.69%3.42%2.39%3.42%3.00%3.06%2.87%2.65%3.02%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BCPIX and MRBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BCPIX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to MRBIX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCPIX dropped -22.43% vs MRBIX's -19.25%.

MRBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCPIX and MRBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer