PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCOR vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCOR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


BCOR

1D
-3.25%
1M
-18.23%
YTD
-15.31%
6M
-19.86%
1Y
-30.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and WNTR is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

-0.81

The correlation between BCOR and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCOR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOR
BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCORWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.33

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

2.73

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

6.99

-8.24

BCOR vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, roughly equal to the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCORWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.99%

-42.65%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.99%

-42.65%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.09%

-4.02%

-36.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-20.87%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.57%

16.66%

+7.91%

Volatility

BCOR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) is 13.86%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that BCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCORWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.86%

18.14%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.19%

46.41%

-13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.08%

53.16%

-11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

53.31%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.52%

53.31%

-9.79%

BCOR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCOR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCOR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to BCOR (13.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs -30.64% for BCOR. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BCOR has been the lower-risk option at 13.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs -30.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 3.72% for BCOR.

BCOR is categorized as Blockchain, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCOR and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer