BCOR vs. WGMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BCOR (Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCOR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Adopters Index, while WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. BCOR is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Over the past year, BCOR returned -30.47% vs 119.73% for WGMI. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BCOR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

BCOR vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 34.47% return.

BCOR

• 1D: -2.60%
• 1M: -7.05%
• 6M: -17.04%
• YTD: -16.45%
• 1Y: -30.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -9.47%

WGMI

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 1Y: 119.73%
• 3Y*: 49.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	$6.33K	$9.47K	$14.95K
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	$36.52M	$32.75M	$41.50M

BCOR vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	-16.45%	5.68%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	34.47%	169.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and WGMI is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.70

The correlation between BCOR and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

BCOR vs. WGMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BCOR	WGMI
Consumer Cyclical	36.0%	-
Financial Services	29.0%	45.4%
Technology	25.5%	47.8%
Communication Services	7.7%	2.0%
Industrials	1.0%	0.7%
Energy	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Healthcare	0.2%	-
Utilities	0.2%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BCOR vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCOR

BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCOR vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCOR	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	1.25	-2.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.03	1.95	-2.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.23	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	2.05	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	3.96	-5.21

BCOR vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCOR	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.99%	-85.76%	+42.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.99%	-50.94%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.90%	-28.63%	-12.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.38%	-41.97%	+21.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.14%	26.29%	+0.85%

Volatility

BCOR vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) is 12.98%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 35.22%. This indicates that BCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCOR	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.98%	35.22%	-22.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.02%	61.62%	-27.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.11%	83.14%	-40.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.51%	82.40%	-38.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.51%	82.40%	-38.89%

BCOR vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCOR vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	3.77%	3.10%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCOR and WGMI in my portfolio?

BCOR and WGMI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCOR or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (35.22%) compared to BCOR (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, BCOR or WGMI?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 119.73% vs -30.47% for BCOR. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BCOR has been the lower-risk option at 12.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCOR or WGMI?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 119.73% return vs -30.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCOR or WGMI?

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCOR or WGMI?

BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between BCOR and WGMI?

BCOR is categorized as Blockchain, while WGMI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.