BCOR vs. GDLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BCOR (Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF) and GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCOR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Adopters Index, while GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BCOR returned -24.56% vs -38.54% for GDLC. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

BCOR vs. GDLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -8.74% return, which is significantly higher than GDLC's -32.51% return.

BCOR

• 1D: -3.15%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: -8.74%
• 6M: -13.96%
• 1Y: -24.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDLC

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -17.46%
• YTD: -32.51%
• 6M: -32.63%
• 1Y: -38.54%
• 3Y*: 49.72%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOR vs. GDLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	-8.74%	5.68%
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-32.51%	8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and GDLC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.77

The correlation between BCOR and GDLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCOR vs. GDLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOR

BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 4
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 3
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOR vs. GDLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCOR	GDLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	-0.79	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	-1.03	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.88	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	-0.69	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	-1.16	+0.15

BCOR vs. GDLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is comparable to the GDLC Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and GDLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. GDLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, smaller than the maximum GDLC drawdown of -94.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and GDLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCOR	GDLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.99%	-94.14%	+51.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.99%	-56.34%	+13.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.45%	-56.58%	+21.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.73%	-52.78%	+34.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.32%	33.36%	-9.04%

Volatility

BCOR vs. GDLC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) have volatilities of 13.29% and 13.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCOR	GDLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.29%	13.86%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.95%	36.82%	-3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.79%	49.09%	-7.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.40%	73.78%	-30.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.40%	94.18%	-50.78%

BCOR vs. GDLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCOR and GDLC have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

BCOR vs. GDLC - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	3.46%	3.10%
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCOR and GDLC in my portfolio?

BCOR and GDLC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCOR or GDLC?

GDLC has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to BCOR (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs GDLC's -94.14%.

Which ETF is better, BCOR or GDLC?

On 1-year performance, BCOR leads with -24.56% vs -38.54% for GDLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, BCOR has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCOR or GDLC?

Over the 1-year period, BCOR has performed better with a -24.56% return vs -38.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCOR or GDLC?

BCOR and GDLC have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCOR or GDLC?

BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.

What is the main difference between BCOR and GDLC?

BCOR is categorized as Blockchain, while GDLC is Cryptocurrency. BCOR tracks Indxx Bitcoin Adopters Index, while GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.