BCIM vs. FLUD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCIM (abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCIM is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Industrial Metals, while FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. BCIM is passively managed, while FLUD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BCIM charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLUD.

Performance

BCIM vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCIM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLUD

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 5.33%
• 5Y*: 3.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIM vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	0.00%	10.71%	3.30%	-9.68%	-3.29%	4.17%
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.53%	5.36%	5.44%	5.95%	0.16%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIM and FLUD is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021	-0.01

The correlation between BCIM and FLUD shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCIM vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUD

FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIM vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCIM	FLUD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	2.59	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BCIM	FLUD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-1.66%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.24%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCIM	FLUD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.34%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.26%	—

BCIM vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIM has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCIM vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison

BCIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than FLUD's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	3.77%	3.77%	11.47%	3.36%	0.72%	1.57%	0.00%
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.27%	4.51%	4.97%	4.72%	1.39%	0.92%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCIM and FLUD in my portfolio?

BCIM and FLUD have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCIM or FLUD?

On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCIM or FLUD?

FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for BCIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCIM or FLUD?

FLUD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.77% for BCIM.

What is the main difference between BCIM and FLUD?

BCIM is categorized as Metals, while FLUD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for BCIM and 0.15% for FLUD.