BCIL vs. DWMF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF).

BCIL and DWMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCIL is an actively managed fund by Bancreek. It was launched on Mar 20, 2024. DWMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018.

Performance

BCIL vs. DWMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCIL vs. DWMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF	-5.88%	11.95%	0.56%
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund	3.84%	24.42%	5.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCIL achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly lower than DWMF's 3.84% return.

BCIL

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: -8.32%
• YTD: -5.88%
• 6M: -9.12%
• 1Y: -0.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DWMF

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIL vs. DWMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DWMF's 0.38% expense ratio.

BCIL

Bancreek International Large Cap ETF

DWMF

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund

Return for Risk

BCIL vs. DWMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCIL

BCIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
BCIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BCIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BCIL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BCIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BCIL Martin Ratio Rank: 11

DWMF

DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIL vs. DWMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCIL	DWMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	1.38	-1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	2.02	-1.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.29	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	2.13	-2.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	8.12	-8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCIL vs. DWMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the DWMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCIL and DWMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCIL	DWMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02	1.38	-1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.53	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between BCIL and DWMF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BCIL vs. DWMF - Dividend Comparison

BCIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than DWMF's 2.87% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF	1.13%	1.25%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund	2.87%	2.80%	3.50%	4.01%	3.41%	3.54%	2.06%	2.77%	1.15%

Drawdowns

BCIL vs. DWMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCIL drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, smaller than the maximum DWMF drawdown of -29.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIL and DWMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCIL	DWMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.18%	-29.72%	+13.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.18%	-8.74%	-7.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.93%	-5.33%	-8.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-3.88%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.68%	2.29%	+4.39%

Volatility

BCIL vs. DWMF - Volatility Comparison

Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) at 5.84%. This indicates that BCIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCIL	DWMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	5.84%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.84%	8.39%	+2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	13.70%	+3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	11.20%	+3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	14.16%	+1.02%