BCIL vs. CIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).
BCIL and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCIL is an actively managed fund by Bancreek. It was launched on Mar 20, 2024. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015.
Performance
BCIL vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCIL vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF | -5.88% | 11.95% | 0.56% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | -0.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCIL achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.
BCIL
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -5.88%
- 6M
- -9.12%
- 1Y
- -0.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCIL vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCIL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCIL vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
BCIL
CIL
BCIL vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCIL | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | 2.29 | -2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | 3.15 | -3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.54 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.32 | -2.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 15.10 | -15.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCIL | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 2.29 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.44 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCIL and CIL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCIL vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
BCIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than CIL's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 2.38% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
BCIL vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCIL drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIL and CIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCIL | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -36.27% | +20.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -9.66% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -0.58% | -13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -6.66% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 1.73% | +4.95% |
Volatility
BCIL vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that BCIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCIL | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 0.00% | +7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 5.76% | +5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 13.30% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.67% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.32% | -2.14% |