PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCIFX vs. VALAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCIFX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than VALAX's 23.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BCIFX has underperformed VALAX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while VALAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.37% annualized return.


BCIFX

1D
1.53%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.08%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
7.31%

VALAX

1D
0.92%
1M
4.98%
YTD
23.95%
6M
24.67%
1Y
53.83%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCIFX
Blue Chip Investor Fund
0.58%15.39%7.64%18.88%-16.65%29.25%-6.07%20.90%-15.13%18.52%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
23.95%23.57%13.35%14.05%-13.50%24.97%10.22%33.98%-7.87%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIFX and VALAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.87

The correlation between BCIFX and VALAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCIFX vs. VALAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCIFX
BCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VALAX
VALAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCIFXVALAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.70

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

6.29

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

25.15

-20.15

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VALAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCIFX and VALAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCIFXVALAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

3.94

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.66

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.75

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.44

-0.26

Drawdowns

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCIFX drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VALAX drawdown of -61.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIFX and VALAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCIFXVALAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.12%

-61.26%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-8.56%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.12%

-25.81%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.12%

-25.81%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.12%

-38.22%

-23.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.23%

0.00%

-51.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-10.74%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.14%

+0.99%

Volatility

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Volatility Comparison

Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Al Frank Fund (VALAX) at 3.95%. This indicates that BCIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCIFXVALAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.95%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

10.73%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

13.67%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.99%

17.78%

+48.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.04%

19.33%

+29.71%

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VALAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCIFX vs. VALAX - Dividend Comparison

BCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than VALAX's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCIFX
Blue Chip Investor Fund
3.12%3.14%0.32%4.68%1.66%1.29%0.14%1.23%5.58%5.84%6.18%6.41%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
6.98%8.65%10.32%5.95%8.62%6.83%7.17%13.51%10.73%10.66%5.32%9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCIFX and VALAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCIFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to VALAX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCIFX dropped -62.12% vs VALAX's -61.26%.

VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCIFX and VALAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer