PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCIFX vs. AVERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCIFX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 12.90% return.


BCIFX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
2.04%
6M
1.37%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
7.51%

AVERX

1D
0.29%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
12.90%
6M
10.81%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCIFX
Blue Chip Investor Fund
2.04%18.01%
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
12.90%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIFX and AVERX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCIFX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCIFX
BCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCIFXAVERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.11

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

2.90

+2.33

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the AVERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCIFX and AVERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCIFX drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIFX and AVERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCIFXAVERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.12%

-12.42%

-49.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-12.42%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.52%

-12.17%

-38.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-5.89%

-6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

4.77%

-1.60%

Volatility

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) is 4.02%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that BCIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCIFXAVERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

5.20%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

14.70%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

19.47%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.98%

18.92%

+47.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.04%

18.92%

+30.12%

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCIFX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

BCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than AVERX's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.36%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BCIFX
Blue Chip Investor Fund
3.07%3.14%0.32%4.68%1.66%1.29%0.14%1.23%5.58%5.84%6.18%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCIFX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to BCIFX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCIFX dropped -62.12% vs AVERX's -12.42%.

BCIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCIFX and AVERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer