PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCIFX vs. TILVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCIFX achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than TILVX's 20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BCIFX has underperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 7.09%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.


BCIFX

1D
-1.22%
1M
-1.85%
6M
1.29%
YTD
1.88%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
7.09%
ALL TIME*
6.12%

TILVX

1D
0.48%
1M
1.48%
6M
14.87%
YTD
20.09%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.31%
ALL TIME*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCIFX
Blue Chip Investor Fund
1.88%15.39%7.64%18.88%-16.65%29.25%-6.07%20.90%-15.13%18.52%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
20.09%15.81%14.26%11.49%-7.57%25.05%2.90%26.48%-8.38%10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIFX and TILVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002

0.88

The correlation between BCIFX and TILVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCIFX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCIFX
BCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TILVX
TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCIFXTILVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

4.37

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.47

18.65

-14.18

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCIFX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCIFX drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, roughly equal to the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIFX and TILVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCIFXTILVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.12%

-60.05%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-6.80%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.12%

-15.58%

-46.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.12%

-19.00%

-43.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.12%

-40.15%

-21.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.60%

-0.53%

-50.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-8.21%

-4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

1.61%

+1.53%

Volatility

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

Blue Chip Investor Fund (BCIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) at 2.89%. This indicates that BCIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCIFXTILVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

2.89%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

8.72%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

11.44%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.00%

14.83%

+51.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.04%

17.62%

+31.42%

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCIFX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

BCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than TILVX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCIFX
Blue Chip Investor Fund
3.08%3.14%0.32%4.68%1.66%1.29%0.14%1.23%5.58%5.84%6.18%6.41%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
4.96%5.96%3.04%4.90%4.57%3.77%2.26%7.05%4.68%2.01%3.14%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCIFX and TILVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCIFX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to TILVX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCIFX dropped -62.12% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCIFX and TILVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer