BCI vs. AVGB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen, while AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCI returned 37.16% vs 4.50% for AVGB. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. BCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AVGB.

Performance

BCI vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 25.35% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's 0.84% return.

BCI

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 24.07%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: 15.51%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: —

AVGB

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCI vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	25.35%	9.63%
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	0.84%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BCI and AVGB is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	-0.27

Return for Risk

BCI vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 70
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

AVGB

AVGB Risk / Return Rank: 52
AVGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AVGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AVGB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AVGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AVGB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCI vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCI	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.83	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.71	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.90	2.13	+2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.53	7.95	+4.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCI vs. AVGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the AVGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCI and AVGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCI	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	1.83	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	2.06	-1.59

Drawdowns

BCI vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and AVGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCI	AVGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.69%	-2.12%	-30.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-2.12%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.52%	-0.37%	-5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.00%	-0.33%	-11.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	0.57%	+2.40%

Volatility

BCI vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.84%. This indicates that BCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCI	AVGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	0.84%	+4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.84%	1.91%	+12.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	2.48%	+14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	2.48%	+14.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.65%	2.48%	+13.17%

BCI vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BCI vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison

BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%, more than AVGB's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	3.46%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.15%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCI and AVGB in my portfolio?

BCI and AVGB have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCI or AVGB?

BCI has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCI dropped -32.69% vs AVGB's -2.12%.

Which ETF is better, BCI or AVGB?

On 1-year performance, BCI leads with 37.16% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCI or AVGB?

Over the 1-year period, BCI has performed better with a 37.16% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCI or AVGB?

AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCI or AVGB?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.15%, compared with 3.46% for AVGB.

What is the main difference between BCI and AVGB?

BCI is categorized as Commodities, while AVGB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCI and 0.19% for AVGB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.