BCHS.L vs. BND

Last updated Jun 11, 2026

BCHS.L (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCHS.L returned 11.05%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BCHS.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

BCHS.L vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BCHS.L is traded in GBp, while BND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BND values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHS.L achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.69% return.

BCHS.L

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: 44.46%
• 3Y*: 39.54%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: —

BND

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 0.08%
• 1Y: 5.52%
• 3Y*: 1.78%
• 5Y*: 1.00%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHS.L vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	17.59%	35.24%	18.50%	58.28%	-46.25%	26.00%	89.05%	-12.06%
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	0.69%	-0.55%	3.15%	0.37%	-2.78%	-0.93%	4.55%	5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHS.L and BND is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019	-0.08

Return for Risk

BCHS.L vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHS.L

BCHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BCHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BCHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BCHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BCHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BND

BND Risk / Return Rank: 39
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHS.L vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCHS.L	BND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	0.89	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.36	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.17	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.03	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.03	2.69	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCHS.L vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHS.L and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCHS.L	BND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	0.89	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.12	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.52	-0.02

Drawdowns

BCHS.L vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHS.L drawdown since its inception was -55.89%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHS.L and BND.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHS.L	BND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.89%	-17.48%	-38.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.49%	-5.37%	-24.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	-8.65%	-26.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.89%	-14.67%	-41.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.82%	-9.67%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.09%	-7.06%	-16.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.62%	2.06%	+12.56%

Volatility

BCHS.L vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a higher volatility of 12.16% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.39%. This indicates that BCHS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHS.L	BND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.16%	1.39%	+10.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.84%	4.76%	+21.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.25%	6.25%	+32.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.20%	8.63%	+29.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.49%	9.98%	+26.51%

BCHS.L vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHS.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHS.L vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

BCHS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	3.98%	3.86%	3.67%	3.09%	2.60%	2.12%	2.38%	2.72%	2.81%	2.54%	2.51%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHS.L and BND in my portfolio?

BCHS.L and BND have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCHS.L or BND?

On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHS.L or BND?

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.

What is the main difference between BCHS.L and BND?

BCHS.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. BCHS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHS.L and 0.03% for BND.