BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L
BCHN.L (Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF) and HNSS.L (HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHN.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HNSS.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCHN.L returned 45.96%/yr vs 62.55%/yr for HNSS.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCHN.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HNSS.L.
Performance
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BCHN.L is traded in USD, while HNSS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HNSS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCHN.L achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly lower than HNSS.L's 91.30% return.
BCHN.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 61.23%
- 3Y*
- 45.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- —
HNSS.L
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 20.84%
- YTD
- 91.30%
- 6M
- 94.68%
- 1Y
- 191.36%
- 3Y*
- 62.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHN.L Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF | 25.82% | 45.50% | 17.30% | 66.38% | -45.10% |
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 91.30% | 56.48% | 17.97% | 69.39% | -27.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHN.L and HNSS.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between BCHN.L and HNSS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L — Risk / Return Rank
BCHN.L
HNSS.L
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCHN.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.74 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 12.24 | -10.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 45.22 | -41.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCHN.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 5.77 | -4.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.26 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHN.L drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, which is greater than HNSS.L's maximum drawdown of -41.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHN.L and HNSS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCHN.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.69% | -41.16% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.54% | -15.53% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.39% | -37.48% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -2.62% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.68% | -11.69% | -11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.09% | 4.21% | +10.88% |
Volatility
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) is 11.58%, while HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a volatility of 13.92%. This indicates that BCHN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCHN.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 13.92% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.89% | 25.91% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.59% | 32.97% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.82% | 31.99% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.68% | 31.99% | +4.69% |
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCHN.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HNSS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCHN.L vs. HNSS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCHN.L nor HNSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCHN.L and HNSS.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HNSS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HNSS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while HNSS.L is Semiconductors. BCHN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HNSS.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHN.L and 0.35% for HNSS.L.
Find the right allocation for BCHN.L and HNSS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer