PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCH vs. SBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BCH vs. SBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco de Chile (BCH) and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCH achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than SBS's 14.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BCH has underperformed SBS with an annualized return of 13.50%, while SBS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.


BCH

1D
6.05%
1M
6.79%
YTD
7.61%
6M
8.46%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
30.56%
5Y*
22.62%
10Y*
13.50%

SBS

1D
1.88%
1M
-14.65%
YTD
14.44%
6M
14.49%
1Y
41.53%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
33.18%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCH vs. SBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCH
Banco de Chile
7.61%81.24%6.15%23.37%41.22%-20.93%2.32%-24.00%-6.21%45.00%
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
14.44%80.60%-4.21%46.89%48.42%-13.79%-40.98%91.22%-20.37%23.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BCH and SBS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2002

0.33

The correlation between BCH and SBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (5 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCH:

$19.47B

SBS:

$19.10B

EPS

BCH:

$2.26K

SBS:

$2.48

PE Ratio

BCH:

0.02

SBS:

2.19

PEG Ratio

BCH:

0.00

SBS:

0.04

PS Ratio

BCH:

0.01

SBS:

0.48

PB Ratio

BCH:

0.00

SBS:

0.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCH:

$3.07T

SBS:

$38.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCH:

$2.62T

SBS:

$13.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCH:

$1.55T

SBS:

$14.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCH vs. SBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCH
BCH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCH Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCH Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SBS
SBS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCH vs. SBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco de Chile (BCH) and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCHSBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.68

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

5.29

-1.36

BCH vs. SBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the SBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCH and SBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCHSBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.90

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.37

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.35

+0.14

Drawdowns

BCH vs. SBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCH drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, smaller than the maximum SBS drawdown of -76.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCH and SBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHSBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.68%

-76.49%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.99%

-24.88%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-24.88%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

-30.35%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.68%

-61.91%

+4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.80%

-23.47%

+11.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-25.70%

+12.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.06%

7.88%

+1.18%

Volatility

BCH vs. SBS - Volatility Comparison

Banco de Chile (BCH) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) at 9.39%. This indicates that BCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCHSBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.15%

9.39%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.34%

24.58%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.32%

33.87%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.41%

36.91%

-8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

43.52%

-14.32%

Dividends

BCH vs. SBS - Dividend Comparison

BCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than SBS's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCH
Banco de Chile
5.68%5.54%7.46%9.01%6.39%3.76%3.95%5.04%3.55%2.20%3.32%4.35%
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
2.35%4.68%1.96%1.66%1.88%0.97%2.93%1.99%3.86%2.76%0.65%1.91%

Financials

BCH vs. SBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco de Chile and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
1.05T
9.78B
(BCH) Total Revenue
(SBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BCH vs. SBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Banco de Chile and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
62.8%
38.8%
Portfolio components
BCH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported a gross profit of 661.74B and revenue of 1.05T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.8%.

SBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a gross profit of 3.79B and revenue of 9.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

BCH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported an operating income of 359.62B and revenue of 1.05T, resulting in an operating margin of 34.2%.

SBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported an operating income of 3.33B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.

BCH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported a net income of 278.58B and revenue of 1.05T, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.

SBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a net income of 1.72B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCH and SBS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCH has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to SBS (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCH dropped -57.68% vs SBS's -76.49%.

SBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCH and SBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer