BCH vs. TRMD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Banco de Chile (BCH) and TORM plc (TRMD).

Performance

BCH vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco de Chile (BCH) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCH vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BCH Banco de Chile	3.41%	81.24%	6.15%	23.37%	41.22%	-20.93%	2.32%	-24.00%	-14.19%
TRMD TORM plc	46.25%	11.21%	-23.37%	31.64%	297.66%	12.91%	-25.94%	84.18%	-22.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BCH : $18.71B TRMD : $2.78B
EPS BCH : $2.36K TRMD : $2.85
PE Ratio BCH : 0.02 TRMD : 9.78
PEG Ratio BCH : 0.00 TRMD : 0.10
PS Ratio BCH : 0.01 TRMD : 2.09
PB Ratio BCH : 0.00 TRMD : 1.27
Total Revenue (TTM) BCH : $3.31T TRMD : $1.34B
Gross Profit (TTM) BCH : $2.64T TRMD : $582.69M
EBITDA (TTM) BCH : $1.55T TRMD : $580.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCH achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 46.25% return.

BCH

• 1D: 3.99%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 29.68%
• 1Y: 48.34%
• 3Y*: 32.99%
• 5Y*: 18.15%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

TRMD

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: 46.25%
• 6M: 42.74%
• 1Y: 86.19%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 41.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BCH vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCH

BCH Risk / Return Rank: 83
BCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BCH Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BCH Martin Ratio Rank: 82

TRMD

TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 90
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCH vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco de Chile (BCH) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCH	TRMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.20	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.81	-0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	4.20	-1.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	11.02	-4.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCH vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCH and TRMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCH	TRMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.20	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.90	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.48	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BCH and TRMD is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BCH vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

BCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than TRMD's 7.60% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCH Banco de Chile	5.89%	5.54%	7.46%	9.01%	6.39%	3.76%	3.95%	5.04%	3.55%	2.20%	3.32%	4.35%
TRMD TORM plc	7.60%	10.32%	30.13%	23.05%	6.99%	0.00%	14.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BCH vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCH drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, roughly equal to the maximum TRMD drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCH and TRMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCH	TRMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.68%	-60.59%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.59%	-19.49%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.47%	-60.59%	+24.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.24%	-13.44%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.86%	-22.91%	+10.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.26%	7.43%	-0.17%

Volatility

BCH vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco de Chile (BCH) is 14.11%, while TORM plc (TRMD) has a volatility of 14.99%. This indicates that BCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCH	TRMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.11%	14.99%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.91%	26.39%	-3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.18%	39.54%	-10.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.63%	45.89%	-17.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.85%	60.26%	-31.41%

Financials

BCH vs. TRMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Banco de Chile and TORM plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BCH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco de Chile reported a gross profit of 632.74B and revenue of 632.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

TRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 134.80M and revenue of 354.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.0%.

BCH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco de Chile reported an operating income of 328.11B and revenue of 632.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.9%.

TRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 98.16M and revenue of 354.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

BCH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco de Chile reported a net income of 265.54B and revenue of 632.74B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.

TRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 87.39M and revenue of 354.98M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.