BCGS vs. VEGA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and VEGA (AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for VEGA.

Performance

BCGS vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCGS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEGA

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 6M: 6.87%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 7.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	6.44%
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF	5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and VEGA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

BCGS vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGA

VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 63
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGS vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCGS	VEGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.53	+0.86

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and VEGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGS	VEGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-28.37%	+20.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-0.52%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-3.79%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCGS	VEGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.77%	9.06%	+12.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	12.29%	+9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	12.70%	+9.07%

BCGS vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCGS vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than VEGA's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF	1.25%	1.34%	1.05%	1.12%	1.89%	0.55%	0.28%	0.44%	0.45%	0.00%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGS and VEGA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BCGS and VEGA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BCGS or VEGA?

On fees, BCGS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCGS or VEGA?

BCGS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCGS or VEGA?

VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCGS and VEGA?

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 2.02% for VEGA.