BCGS vs. UFO
BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BCGS is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
BCGS vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCGS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -5.68%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 49.39%
- 6M
- 71.06%
- 1Y
- 135.88%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- —
BCGS vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 6.44% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 27.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGS and UFO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGS vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
BCGS
UFO
BCGS vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGS | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.46 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
BCGS vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGS | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -50.33% | +42.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -14.84% | +12.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -21.82% | +19.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.72% | — |
Volatility
BCGS vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGS | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 38.08% | -16.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 29.92% | -8.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 30.76% | -8.99% |
BCGS vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGS vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than UFO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.29% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGS and UFO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UFO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UFO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.75% for UFO.
Find the right allocation for BCGS and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer