PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGD vs. BDAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares (BDAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGD achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than BDAFX's 6.40% return.


BCGD

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.41%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDAFX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.96%
YTD
6.40%
6M
6.82%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCGD and BDAFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGD vs. BDAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGD

BDAFX
BDAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BDAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BDAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares (BDAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCGDBDAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.85

-0.43

Drawdowns

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGD drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum BDAFX drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGD and BDAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGDBDAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-33.59%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.54%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-5.86%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

Volatility

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGDBDAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

15.96%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

20.24%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

21.95%

-4.08%

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDAFX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGD vs. BDAFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCGD nor BDAFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BCGD
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BDAFX
Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares
0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.33%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCGD and BDAFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGD and BDAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer