BCGD vs. BDAFX
BCGD (Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF) and BDAFX (Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares) are both funds - BCGD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while BDAFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BDAFX.
Performance
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCGD achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than BDAFX's 1.46% return.
BCGD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDAFX
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- —
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCGD Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF | 1.00% | 1.64% |
BDAFX Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares | 1.46% | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGD and BDAFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGD vs. BDAFX — Risk / Return Rank
BCGD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDAFX
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares (BDAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCGD | BDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGD drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum BDAFX drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGD and BDAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGD | BDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -33.59% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -5.15% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -5.84% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGD | BDAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 16.89% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 20.40% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 21.98% | -3.59% |
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDAFX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGD vs. BDAFX - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCGD nor BDAFX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGD Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BDAFX Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGD and BDAFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BCGD and BDAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer