BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE
BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UIQ4.DE (UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while UIQ4.DE is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BCFU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for UIQ4.DE.
Performance
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BCFU.DE is traded in USD, while UIQ4.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UIQ4.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than UIQ4.DE's 1.83% return.
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
UIQ4.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.70% | 11.75% |
UIQ4.DE UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 1.83% | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFU.DE and UIQ4.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFU.DE
UIQ4.DE
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFU.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFU.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.12 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and UIQ4.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFU.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -6.70% | -22.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -1.13% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -1.66% | -10.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFU.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.96% | 10.40% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 10.40% | +5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 10.40% | +4.15% |
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFU.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFU.DE nor UIQ4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFU.DE and UIQ4.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIQ4.DE is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIQ4.DE is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
BCFU.DE is categorized as Commodities, while UIQ4.DE is Derivative Income. BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while UIQ4.DE tracks Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFU.DE and UIQ4.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer