PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE) and UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIQ4.DE achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than CHSJ.DE's 0.36% return.


UIQ4.DE

1D
1.19%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
0.12%
6M
3.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHSJ.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.36%
6M
1.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIQ4.DE has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CHSJ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE) and UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIQ4.DECHSJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

2.24

-1.13

Correlation

The correlation between UIQ4.DE and CHSJ.DE is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UIQ4.DE nor CHSJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIQ4.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, which is greater than CHSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQ4.DE and CHSJ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UIQ4.DECHSJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-0.38%

-3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-0.31%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.07%

-0.81%

Volatility

UIQ4.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UIQ4.DECHSJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

1.31%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.24%

1.31%

+5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.24%

1.31%

+5.93%