BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE
BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UBU7.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while UBU7.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCFU.DE returned 12.00%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for UBU7.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCFU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for UBU7.DE.
Performance
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BCFU.DE is traded in USD, while UBU7.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UBU7.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than UBU7.DE's 9.53% return.
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
UBU7.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.70% | 19.44% | 4.91% | -5.62% | 16.93% | 32.04% | 1.23% | 6.92% | -6.42% | 5.98% |
UBU7.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 9.53% | 21.87% | 18.72% | 23.76% | -18.69% | 21.81% | 15.42% | 28.16% | -9.83% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFU.DE and UBU7.DE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.27 |
The correlation between BCFU.DE and UBU7.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFU.DE
UBU7.DE
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBU7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFU.DE | UBU7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 3.01 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 12.92 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFU.DE | UBU7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.21 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.78 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, smaller than the maximum UBU7.DE drawdown of -34.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and UBU7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFU.DE | UBU7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -34.32% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -8.55% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -17.94% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -26.05% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -0.46% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -4.34% | -7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.00% | +0.41% |
Volatility
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBU7.DE) at 2.90%. This indicates that BCFU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBU7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFU.DE | UBU7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 2.90% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 8.59% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.96% | 11.65% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 15.49% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 15.89% | -1.34% |
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UBU7.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFU.DE vs. UBU7.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBU7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBU7.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 1.13% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.52% | 0.90% | 1.28% | 1.54% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFU.DE and UBU7.DE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UBU7.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBU7.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
BCFU.DE is categorized as Commodities, while UBU7.DE is Global Equities. BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while UBU7.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.10% for UBU7.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFU.DE and UBU7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer