UBU7.DE vs. VXUS
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBU7.DE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS).
UBU7.DE and VXUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UBU7.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Apr 11, 2012. VXUS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. Both UBU7.DE and VXUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UBU7.DE or VXUS.
Key characteristics
UBU7.DE | VXUS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 13.98% | 9.24% |
1Y Return | 19.40% | 16.56% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 7.50% | 1.81% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.52% | 6.76% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 10.01% | 4.70% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 1.29 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.80% | 12.77% |
Max Drawdown | -33.84% | -35.97% |
Current Drawdown | -2.27% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBU7.DE and VXUS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UBU7.DE vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UBU7.DE achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, UBU7.DE has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 10.01%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UBU7.DE vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBU7.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UBU7.DE vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBU7.DE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UBU7.DE vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
UBU7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.48% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% | 3.40% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
UBU7.DE vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBU7.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBU7.DE and VXUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UBU7.DE vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBU7.DE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.