BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE
BCFB.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and ZPRA.DE (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BCFB.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while ZPRA.DE tracks the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFB.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for ZPRA.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ZPRA.DE.
Performance
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFB.DE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRA.DE's 4.42% return.
BCFB.DE
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPRA.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 10.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.44% | 5.74% | 11.41% | 4.33% | -2.34% |
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.42% | 9.80% | 11.25% | 11.54% | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFB.DE and ZPRA.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BCFB.DE and ZPRA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFB.DE
ZPRA.DE
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFB.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.93 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 5.05 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFB.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.11 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum ZPRA.DE drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFB.DE and ZPRA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFB.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -31.54% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -5.57% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -13.55% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -2.76% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -6.47% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.13% | +0.19% |
Volatility
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) at 2.71%. This indicates that BCFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFB.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 2.71% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 7.42% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 9.67% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 12.92% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 14.47% | -0.15% |
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRA.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFB.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZPRA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 3.64% | 4.00% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 2.25% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFB.DE and ZPRA.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.
BCFB.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while ZPRA.DE tracks S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BCFB.DE and 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFB.DE and ZPRA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer