PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCDF vs. SFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCDF vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 22.26% return.


BCDF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
3.23%
6M
4.02%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
10Y*

SFTX

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.93%
YTD
22.26%
6M
24.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCDF vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCDF and SFTX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.37

BCDF vs. SFTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BCDF
SFTX

Financial Services

80.2%
16.2%

Technology

9.7%
28.2%

Utilities

4.7%
1.9%

Energy

3.5%
8.0%

Communication Services

1.4%
4.5%

Industrials

0.4%
12.1%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.9%

Healthcare

0.0%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Financial Services

BCDF
80.2%
SFTX
16.2%

Technology

BCDF
9.7%
SFTX
28.2%

Utilities

BCDF
4.7%
SFTX
1.9%

Energy

BCDF
3.5%
SFTX
8.0%

Communication Services

BCDF
1.4%
SFTX
4.5%

Industrials

BCDF
0.4%
SFTX
12.1%

Real Estate

BCDF
0.1%
SFTX
0.9%

Healthcare

BCDF
0.0%
SFTX
10.1%

Basic Materials

BCDF

-

SFTX
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BCDF

-

SFTX
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

BCDF

-

SFTX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCDF vs. SFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SFTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCDF vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCDFSFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

BCDF vs. SFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCDFSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

2.57

-2.18

Drawdowns

BCDF vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, which is greater than SFTX's maximum drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and SFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCDFSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.70%

-12.75%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.63%

-0.29%

-7.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-2.78%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

BCDF vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCDFSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

21.65%

-6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

21.65%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

21.65%

-4.71%

BCDF vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCDF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCDF vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than SFTX's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.45%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%
SFTX
Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
0.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCDF and SFTX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFTX is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFTX is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

BCDF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SFTX is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BCDF and 0.82% for SFTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCDF and SFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer