BCDF vs. JAPN
BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) and JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCDF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Horizon, while JAPN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCDF returned 6.26% vs -16.72% for JAPN. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
BCDF vs. JAPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than JAPN's -13.33% return.
BCDF
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAPN
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -13.01%
- 1Y
- -16.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF vs. JAPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 3.23% | 2.80% |
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | -13.33% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCDF and JAPN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCDF vs. JAPN — Risk / Return Rank
BCDF
JAPN
BCDF vs. JAPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCDF | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.86 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.70 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | -1.34 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCDF | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | -0.90 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | -0.54 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
BCDF vs. JAPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, which is greater than JAPN's maximum drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and JAPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCDF | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.70% | -23.94% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.63% | -23.94% | +16.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -22.90% | +15.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -9.47% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 12.54% | -9.15% |
Volatility
BCDF vs. JAPN - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) at 4.33%. This indicates that BCDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCDF | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.33% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 15.41% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 18.77% | -4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 19.24% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 19.24% | -2.30% |
BCDF vs. JAPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCDF and JAPN have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
BCDF vs. JAPN - Dividend Comparison
BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than JAPN's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.45% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCDF and JAPN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCDF has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to JAPN (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCDF dropped -27.70% vs JAPN's -23.94%.
On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 6.26% vs -16.72% for JAPN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, JAPN has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCDF and JAPN have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.28% for JAPN.
BCDF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while JAPN is Japan Equities.
BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCDF and JAPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer