PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCDF vs. JAPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCDF vs. JAPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than JAPN's -13.33% return.


BCDF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
3.23%
6M
4.02%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
10Y*

JAPN

1D
-1.75%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-13.33%
6M
-13.01%
1Y
-16.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCDF vs. JAPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCDF and JAPN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCDF vs. JAPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

JAPN
JAPN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
JAPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAPN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
JAPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAPN Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCDF vs. JAPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCDFJAPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.86

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

-0.70

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

-1.34

+3.19

BCDF vs. JAPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCDF Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the JAPN Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCDF and JAPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCDFJAPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

-0.90

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.54

+0.93

Drawdowns

BCDF vs. JAPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, which is greater than JAPN's maximum drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and JAPN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCDFJAPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.70%

-23.94%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-23.94%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.63%

-22.90%

+15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-9.47%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

12.54%

-9.15%

Volatility

BCDF vs. JAPN - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) at 4.33%. This indicates that BCDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCDFJAPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

4.33%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

15.41%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

18.77%

-4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

19.24%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

19.24%

-2.30%

BCDF vs. JAPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCDF and JAPN have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

BCDF vs. JAPN - Dividend Comparison

BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than JAPN's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.45%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%
JAPN
Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF
0.28%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCDF and JAPN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCDF has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to JAPN (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCDF dropped -27.70% vs JAPN's -23.94%.

On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 6.26% vs -16.72% for JAPN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, JAPN has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCDF and JAPN have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.28% for JAPN.

BCDF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while JAPN is Japan Equities.

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCDF and JAPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer