BCDF vs. GSUI
BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BCDF is actively managed, while GSUI is passively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BCDF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
BCDF vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -49.92% return.
BCDF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.43%
GSUI
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- YTD
- -49.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.32K | $19.89K | $48.05K | |
| $227.46K | $286.78K | $708.35K |
BCDF vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 6.12% | 1.23% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -49.92% | -42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCDF and GSUI is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCDF vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
BCDF
GSUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCDF vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCDF | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCDF vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -71.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCDF | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.70% | -71.63% | +43.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -71.45% | +66.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -55.03% | +45.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | — | — |
Volatility
BCDF vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCDF | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 99.34% | -84.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 99.34% | -82.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 99.34% | -82.47% |
BCDF vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCDF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCDF vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.38% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCDF and GSUI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BCDF and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for BCDF and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer