BCDF vs. GSOL
BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCDF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.
Performance
BCDF vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCDF
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | -3.01% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCDF and GSOL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCDF vs. GSOL — Risk / Return Rank
BCDF
GSOL
BCDF vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCDF | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCDF | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | -2.47 | +2.87 |
Drawdowns
BCDF vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -15.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and GSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCDF | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.70% | -15.93% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -15.93% | +8.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -7.61% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | — | — |
Volatility
BCDF vs. GSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCDF | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 45.17% | -30.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 45.17% | -28.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 45.17% | -28.23% |
BCDF vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCDF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCDF vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison
BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.44% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCDF and GSOL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BCDF and 0.35% for GSOL.
Find the right allocation for BCDF and GSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer