BCD vs. ZSC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and ZSC (USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCD returned 31.80% vs 36.39% for ZSC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ZSC.

Performance

BCD vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 20.45% return, which is significantly higher than ZSC's 9.47% return.

BCD

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 20.45%
• 6M: 20.51%
• 1Y: 31.80%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 11.98%
• 10Y*: —

ZSC

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 36.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCD vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF	20.45%	15.71%	6.20%	-4.63%
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund	9.47%	28.43%	-14.39%	-10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BCD and ZSC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023	0.35

Return for Risk

BCD vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCD

BCD Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ZSC

ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 84
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCD vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCD	ZSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.88	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.73	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.54	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	4.76	-0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.57	14.69	-2.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCD vs. ZSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCD Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ZSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCD and ZSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCD	ZSC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.88	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.22	+0.46

Drawdowns

BCD vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, which is greater than ZSC's maximum drawdown of -26.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and ZSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCD	ZSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.81%	-26.49%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-7.69%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.60%	-2.71%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.86%	-14.74%	+4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	2.48%	+0.06%

Volatility

BCD vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) at 3.19%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCD	ZSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.19%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	9.09%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	12.70%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.41%	12.24%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	12.24%	+1.66%

BCD vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCD vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison

BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, more than ZSC's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.29%	17.21%	3.60%	4.51%	5.21%	8.30%	1.29%	1.55%	1.59%	0.07%
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund	1.60%	1.75%	2.18%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCD and ZSC in my portfolio?

BCD and ZSC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCD or ZSC?

BCD has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to ZSC (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCD dropped -29.81% vs ZSC's -26.49%.

Which ETF is better, BCD or ZSC?

On 1-year performance, ZSC leads with 36.39% vs 31.80% for BCD. On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ZSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCD or ZSC?

Over the 1-year period, ZSC has performed better with a 36.39% return vs 31.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCD or ZSC?

BCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ZSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCD or ZSC?

BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 1.60% for ZSC.

What is the main difference between BCD and ZSC?

They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BCD and 0.59% for ZSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.