PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCD vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCD vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCD vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
15.57%15.71%6.20%-7.58%8.14%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
24.94%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 24.94% return.


BCD

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.50%
YTD
15.57%
6M
21.94%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*

HGER

1D
0.16%
1M
9.58%
YTD
24.94%
6M
28.72%
1Y
38.09%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCD vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BCD vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCD vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCDHGERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

2.12

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.79

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.51

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.58

15.96

-8.38

BCD vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCD and HGER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCDHGERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.12

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.89

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between BCD and HGER is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BCD vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, more than HGER's 5.67% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
14.89%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.67%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BCD vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and HGER.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCDHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.81%

-23.31%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-8.84%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-0.61%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-7.91%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.50%

+0.61%

Volatility

BCD vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is 5.53%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that BCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCDHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

7.42%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

14.60%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

18.10%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

17.79%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

17.79%

-3.86%