BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and FBTC.TO (Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -45.87% vs -43.70% for FBTC.TO. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BCCL.NEO charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FBTC.TO.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than FBTC.TO's -26.79% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -45.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.13%
FBTC.TO
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -17.34%
- YTD
- -26.79%
- 1Y
- -43.70%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.07K | CA$135.25K | CA$227.19K | |
| CA$1.47M | CA$1.74M | CA$2.64M |
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -28.69% | -6.82% |
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF | -26.79% | -10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and FBTC.TO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and FBTC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
FBTC.TO
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCCL.NEO | FBTC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.87 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.29 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, smaller than the maximum FBTC.TO drawdown of -70.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and FBTC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | FBTC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -70.77% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.27% | -52.71% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.47% | -50.02% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -31.56% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | 35.33% | +1.02% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) at 7.97%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | FBTC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 7.97% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 32.98% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.76% | 43.81% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 51.90% | -7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 51.90% | -7.40% |
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCL.NEO has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.98%, while FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 43.98% | 16.02% |
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BCCL.NEO and FBTC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for BCCL.NEO and 0.35% for FBTC.TO.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and FBTC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer