BCAB vs. HPP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BCAB (BioAtla, Inc.) and HPP (Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.) are both stocks. BCAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HPP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate). Over the past 5 years, BCAB returned -71.95%/yr vs -38.70%/yr for HPP. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BCAB vs. HPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) and Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAB achieves a -87.42% return, which is significantly lower than HPP's 32.96% return.

BCAB

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: -87.42%
• 6M: -89.34%
• 1Y: -82.66%
• 3Y*: -72.68%
• 5Y*: -71.95%
• 10Y*: —

HPP

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 32.96%
• 6M: 40.35%
• 1Y: -26.53%
• 3Y*: -19.93%
• 5Y*: -38.70%
• 10Y*: -20.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAB vs. HPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BCAB BioAtla, Inc.	-87.42%	-3.97%	-75.97%	-70.18%	-57.97%	-42.28%	11.33%
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.	32.96%	-48.94%	-66.86%	1.86%	-57.88%	6.79%	-6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAB and HPP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020	0.19

The correlation between BCAB and HPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS BCAB : -$1.10 HPP : -$10.62
Total Revenue (TTM) BCAB : $0.00 HPP : $814.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) BCAB : -$12.46M HPP : $237.04M
EBITDA (TTM) BCAB : -$67.70M HPP : -$33.73M

Return for Risk

BCAB vs. HPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAB

BCAB Risk / Return Rank: 12
BCAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BCAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BCAB Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BCAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BCAB Martin Ratio Rank: 11

HPP

HPP Risk / Return Rank: 28
HPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HPP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
HPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
HPP Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAB vs. HPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) and Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCAB	HPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	-0.40	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	-0.22	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.98	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.36	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	-0.60	-0.74

BCAB vs. HPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the HPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAB and HPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCAB vs. HPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAB drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, roughly equal to the maximum HPP drawdown of -97.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAB and HPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCAB	HPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.91%	-97.44%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.57%	-74.36%	-20.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.31%	-91.71%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.85%	-96.83%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-97.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-93.32%	-6.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.85%	-30.10%	-54.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.78%	44.11%	+17.67%

Volatility

BCAB vs. HPP - Volatility Comparison

BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) has a higher volatility of 22.93% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) at 20.75%. This indicates that BCAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCAB	HPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.93%	20.75%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.14%	54.76%	+46.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	133.41%	65.87%	+67.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.50%	58.70%	+59.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.02%	47.73%	+67.29%

Dividends

BCAB vs. HPP - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCAB nor HPP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCAB BioAtla, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	3.30%	4.03%	10.28%	4.05%	4.16%	2.66%	3.44%	2.92%	2.30%	2.04%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCAB and HPP in my portfolio?

BCAB and HPP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCAB or HPP?

BCAB has higher volatility (22.93%) compared to HPP (20.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAB dropped -99.91% vs HPP's -97.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.