BBYY vs. TPYP
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. BBYY is actively managed, while TPYP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
BBYY vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -21.74% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 25.73% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -26.26%
- YTD
- -21.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPYP
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 22.68%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 19.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
BBYY vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -21.74% | -7.92% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 25.73% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and TPYP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TPYP
BBYY vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBYY | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.11% | -51.91% | +18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.14% | -0.80% | -29.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -7.85% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.14% | 13.72% | +10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 17.43% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 21.89% | +2.25% |
BBYY vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.49%, more than TPYP's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 107.49% | 21.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.14% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and TPYP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 107.49%, compared with 3.14% for TPYP.
BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TPYP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.40% for TPYP.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer