PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBYY vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBYY vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -13.56% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 2.15% return.


BBYY

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-13.56%
6M
-17.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBTP

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.15%
6M
2.14%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBYY vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BBYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF
-13.56%-7.49%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
2.15%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BBYY and PBTP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBYY vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBYY

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBYY vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BBYY vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBYYPBTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.20

1.30

-2.50

Drawdowns

BBYY vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and PBTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBYYPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-5.44%

-18.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.83%

-0.02%

-22.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.07%

-0.75%

-11.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

Volatility

BBYY vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBYYPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.72%

1.54%

+24.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.72%

2.85%

+22.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.72%

2.64%

+23.08%

BBYY vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBYY vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.93%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF
84.93%21.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
3.10%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBYY and PBTP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.

BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 84.93%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.

BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.07% for PBTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBYY and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer