BBYY vs. PBTP
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PBTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). BBYY is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
BBYY vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -22.28% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 1.74% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- 6M
- -27.04%
- YTD
- -22.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- —
BBYY vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -22.28% | -7.92% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 1.74% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and PBTP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PBTP
BBYY vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBYY | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.11% | -5.44% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.62% | -0.42% | -30.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -0.75% | -13.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.38% | 1.62% | +22.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 2.85% | +21.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 2.63% | +21.75% |
BBYY vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.26%, more than PBTP's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 106.26% | 21.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 4.81% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and PBTP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 106.26%, compared with 4.81% for PBTP.
BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.07% for PBTP.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer