BBYY vs. IBTF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. BBYY is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.

Performance

BBYY vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BBYY

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: -13.56%
• 6M: -17.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.14%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBYY vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	-13.56%	-7.49%
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BBYY and IBTF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

BBYY vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTF

IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBYY vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBYY	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.20	0.44	-1.64

Drawdowns

BBYY vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and IBTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBYY	IBTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.74%	-10.45%	-13.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.83%	0.00%	-22.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.07%	-3.33%	-8.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBYY	IBTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.72%	0.36%	+25.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.72%	2.38%	+23.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.72%	2.56%	+23.16%

BBYY vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBYY vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.93%, more than IBTF's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	84.93%	21.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	2.08%	3.83%	4.32%	4.03%	1.93%	0.57%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBYY and IBTF in my portfolio?

BBYY and IBTF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBYY or IBTF?

On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBYY or IBTF?

IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBYY or IBTF?

BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 84.93%, compared with 2.08% for IBTF.

What is the main difference between BBYY and IBTF?

BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.07% for IBTF.