PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBVSX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVSX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


BBVSX

1D
1.10%
1M
2.50%
YTD
12.39%
6M
0.13%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
9.06%

VMFVX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.15%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.65%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBVSX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
12.39%-2.25%10.61%15.05%-9.75%28.14%6.07%28.04%-14.47%12.65%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.39%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVSX and VMFVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.96

The correlation between BBVSX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBVSX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVSX
BBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBVSXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.18

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

7.51

-4.93

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVSX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBVSXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.51

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.40

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.48

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.52

-0.14

Drawdowns

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVSX drawdown since its inception was -43.42%, smaller than the maximum VMFVX drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVSX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBVSXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.42%

-45.79%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-10.52%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.25%

-22.46%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-22.46%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.42%

-45.79%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

0.00%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-5.48%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

3.05%

+2.14%

Volatility

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) have volatilities of 4.07% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBVSXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

4.02%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

10.50%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

15.14%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

19.47%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

21.88%

-0.87%

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBVSX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

BBVSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVSX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%6.75%3.88%7.57%10.92%2.38%1.32%5.03%1.18%0.82%0.68%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.72%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BBVSX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBVSX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to VMFVX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVSX dropped -43.42% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBVSX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer