BBVSX vs. FSMDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BBVSX (Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - BBVSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Bridge Builder, while FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX returned 9.16%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for FSMDX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BBVSX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSMDX.

Performance

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVSX achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than FSMDX's 14.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.

BBVSX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 9.86%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: 11.92%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 9.16%
• ALL TIME*: 8.07%

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: 11.53%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: 14.95%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 11.45%
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	16.35%	-2.25%	10.61%	15.05%	-9.75%	28.14%	6.07%	28.04%	-14.47%	12.65%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	14.95%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVSX and FSMDX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015	0.93

The correlation between BBVSX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBVSX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBVSX

BBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 15
BBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBVSX	FSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	1.34	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	1.96	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.24	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.25	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	8.71	-6.80

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVSX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVSX drawdown since its inception was -43.42%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVSX and FSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBVSX	FSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.42%	-40.35%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.05%	-8.16%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.25%	-20.92%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.25%	-26.07%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.42%	-40.35%	-3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-0.66%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-4.91%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	2.11%	+3.09%

Volatility

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 2.42%. This indicates that BBVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBVSX	FSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	2.42%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.41%	10.22%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	13.71%	+3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	18.26%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.93%	19.27%	+1.66%

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBVSX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

BBVSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.75%	3.88%	7.57%	10.92%	2.38%	1.32%	5.03%	1.18%	0.82%	0.68%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.76%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBVSX and FSMDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BBVSX and FSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBVSX or FSMDX?

BBVSX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to FSMDX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVSX dropped -43.42% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.