BBVSX vs. NAMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX).
BBVSX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Apr 27, 2015. NAMAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 20, 2001.
Performance
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.45% | -2.25% | 10.61% | 15.05% | -9.75% | 28.14% | 6.07% | 28.04% | -14.47% | 12.65% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 7.05% | 13.77% | 13.14% | 9.65% | -9.33% | 32.28% | 6.90% | 31.56% | -18.46% | 13.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBVSX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than NAMAX's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX has underperformed NAMAX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while NAMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
BBVSX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -7.12%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
NAMAX
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 24.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBVSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than NAMAX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BBVSX vs. NAMAX — Risk / Return Rank
BBVSX
NAMAX
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBVSX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.32 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.43 | 1.88 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.27 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.90 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 8.28 | -7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBVSX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.32 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.53 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.46 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBVSX and NAMAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Dividend Comparison
BBVSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NAMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.75% | 3.88% | 7.57% | 10.92% | 2.38% | 1.32% | 5.03% | 1.18% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.24% | 6.71% | 7.07% | 0.74% | 6.39% | 8.99% | 3.22% | 3.38% | 27.38% | 21.08% | 8.07% | 17.05% |
Drawdowns
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBVSX drawdown since its inception was -43.42%, smaller than the maximum NAMAX drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVSX and NAMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBVSX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.42% | -60.44% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -13.67% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.25% | -20.90% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.42% | -43.24% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.79% | -6.21% | -4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -8.56% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 3.14% | +2.20% |
Volatility
BBVSX vs. NAMAX - Volatility Comparison
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) have volatilities of 5.67% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBVSX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 5.84% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | 10.56% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.73% | 18.99% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 18.12% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 20.02% | +0.96% |