BBVSX vs. FVCSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBVSX (Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and FVCSX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX returned 9.06%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for FVCSX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBVSX charges 0.41%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for FVCSX.

Performance

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVSX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 20.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVSX has underperformed FVCSX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while FVCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.

BBVSX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 11.75%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 5.44%
• 10Y*: 9.06%

FVCSX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 3.38%
• YTD: 20.48%
• 6M: 22.00%
• 1Y: 38.90%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 6.45%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	12.39%	-2.25%	10.61%	15.05%	-9.75%	28.14%	6.07%	28.04%	-14.47%	12.65%
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	20.48%	7.23%	-6.69%	19.32%	-8.35%	31.94%	7.10%	33.09%	-17.58%	16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVSX and FVCSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015	0.95

The correlation between BBVSX and FVCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBVSX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVSX

BBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FVCSX

FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBVSX	FVCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	2.45	-1.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	3.47	-2.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.41	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	4.20	-3.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	15.50	-12.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVSX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBVSX	FVCSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	2.45	-1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.31	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.44	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.29	+0.10

Drawdowns

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVSX drawdown since its inception was -43.42%, smaller than the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVSX and FVCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBVSX	FVCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.42%	-70.38%	+26.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.05%	-9.89%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.25%	-37.07%	+13.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.25%	-37.07%	+13.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.42%	-48.07%	+4.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	0.00%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-11.19%	+5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	2.68%	+2.51%

Volatility

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (BBVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) have volatilities of 4.07% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBVSX	FVCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	4.26%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.29%	11.93%	+2.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.44%	16.99%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	21.05%	-1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	22.19%	-1.18%

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBVSX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

BBVSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FVCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBVSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.75%	3.88%	7.57%	10.92%	2.38%	1.32%	5.03%	1.18%	0.82%	0.68%
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	10.85%	13.08%	0.00%	2.96%	2.23%	9.80%	0.33%	5.50%	18.83%	8.78%	25.66%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBVSX and FVCSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BBVSX and FVCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBVSX or FVCSX?

FVCSX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to BBVSX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVSX dropped -43.42% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.