PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBVLX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVLX achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 8.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBVLX having a 12.06% annualized return and FBLEX not far behind at 11.86%.


BBVLX

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.80%
YTD
9.03%
6M
1.42%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
12.06%

FBLEX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.80%
YTD
8.08%
6M
9.32%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
9.03%4.45%22.32%13.84%-5.32%26.23%9.57%28.49%-8.15%17.20%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.08%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVLX and FBLEX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.96

The correlation between BBVLX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBVLX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVLX
BBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBVLXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.21

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

13.00

-10.17

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVLX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBVLXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.11

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.77

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.68

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.73

-0.11

Drawdowns

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVLX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FBLEX drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVLX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBVLXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-39.73%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-6.89%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-14.71%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-19.00%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.48%

-39.73%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.46%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-3.83%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

1.70%

+2.40%

Volatility

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBVLXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.61%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

7.87%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

10.50%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

14.80%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

17.39%

+0.55%

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVLX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBVLX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

BBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FBLEX's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
1.68%1.89%14.73%5.11%9.12%7.09%1.62%1.80%3.45%2.23%1.68%1.24%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.28%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BBVLX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBVLX has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FBLEX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVLX dropped -38.48% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBVLX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer