BBVLX vs. MGV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BBVLX (Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BBVLX returned 12.18%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBVLX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.

Performance

BBVLX vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVLX achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BBVLX has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 12.18%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.

BBVLX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 8.97%
• 1Y: 12.13%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: 12.18%

MGV

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 16.55%
• 1Y: 30.47%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVLX vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBVLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund	9.54%	4.45%	22.32%	13.84%	-5.32%	26.23%	9.57%	28.49%	-8.15%	17.20%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	16.85%	15.45%	16.94%	9.16%	-1.22%	25.93%	2.50%	25.54%	-4.13%	16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVLX and MGV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015	0.94

The correlation between BBVLX and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBVLX vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVLX

BBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 13
BBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

MGV

MGV Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVLX vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBVLX	MGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	3.02	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	4.27	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.54	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	4.77	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	18.12	-15.10

BBVLX vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVLX and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBVLX vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVLX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVLX and MGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBVLX	MGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.48%	-56.07%	+17.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-6.42%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.58%	-13.18%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.24%	-16.54%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.48%	-35.41%	-3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	0.00%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-7.78%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	1.69%	+2.41%

Volatility

BBVLX vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.32%. This indicates that BBVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBVLX	MGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	3.32%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	7.77%	+3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.36%	10.15%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.31%	13.57%	+2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	16.36%	+1.60%

BBVLX vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVLX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBVLX vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

BBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than MGV's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBVLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund	1.67%	1.89%	14.73%	5.11%	9.12%	7.09%	1.62%	1.80%	3.45%	2.23%	1.68%	1.24%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	1.82%	2.04%	2.31%	2.48%	2.45%	2.17%	2.47%	2.69%	2.65%	2.34%	2.53%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBVLX and MGV in my portfolio?

BBVLX and MGV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBVLX or MGV?

BBVLX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVLX dropped -38.48% vs MGV's -56.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.