PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. NRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 35.88% return.


BBUS

1D
1.46%
1M
1.67%
6M
9.38%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.98%

NRSH

1D
1.65%
1M
-3.34%
6M
23.82%
YTD
35.88%
1Y
50.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.15M$23.57M$29.57M
$198.65K$150.08K$89.39K

BBUS vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.30%17.77%24.89%5.08%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
35.88%12.95%-6.17%9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and NRSH is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.66

The correlation between BBUS and NRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBUS vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
NRSH

Technology

38.7%
56.1%

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

9.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Industrials

8.6%
41.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.0%
2.5%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Technology

BBUS
38.7%
NRSH
56.1%

Financial Services

BBUS
11.6%
NRSH

-

Communication Services

BBUS
9.9%
NRSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.4%
NRSH

-

Healthcare

BBUS
8.9%
NRSH

-

Industrials

BBUS
8.6%
NRSH
41.1%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.4%
NRSH

-

Energy

BBUS
3.0%
NRSH
2.5%

Utilities

BBUS
2.2%
NRSH

-

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
NRSH
2.8%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.6%
NRSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBUS vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBUSNRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.63

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

12.40

-2.03

BBUS vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and NRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSNRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-24.01%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-13.84%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-8.72%

+8.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.58%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

4.05%

-1.87%

Volatility

BBUS vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 3.82%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSNRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

8.71%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

23.07%

-12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

27.49%

-14.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

22.50%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

22.50%

-3.00%

BBUS vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBUS vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than NRSH's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.31%0.42%0.90%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBUS and NRSH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRSH has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to BBUS (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 50.05% vs 22.56% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 50.05% return vs 22.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.31% for NRSH.

BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.75% for NRSH.

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and NRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer